Thus, in a note, the military trade unions (SINAFI, SIM CC, SIM GDF, SIM AM, SIM MARINA, SIM COAST GUARD and SIULM ) have expressed their dissent to some contents of the ongoing work of the law c. 875 which should place their activity in a clear and defined legislative framework.
In the session n. 172 of the IV defense committee of the Chamber of Deputies has come to appoint yet another "select committee" which will have to draw up a basic text for the unionization of military personnel.
The rapporteur - honorable Emanuela Corda - stated that the purpose of the "select committee" would be to acquire all the elements necessary to prepare a new text of the law c.875.
Instead, the bill c. 1702, presented by members of the PD, paradoxically reveals extremely involutive and obscurantist aspects with respect to the adequate and necessary recognition of trade union rights for military personnel. We cannot hide our concern about the path taken by the process of organizing military personnel, which has been awaited for decades and certainly not made possible by the will and courage of politics, but only following the decisions taken first by the European Court of Human Rights man and then from the constitutional court. We cannot but externalize, therefore, the strong disappointment on the attitude of the political class that appears to be subservient to the will and to the extremely corservatory visions of military leaders.
The writers of trade unions, however, remain strongly perplexed and disappointed by the deafening silence of the political leaders of the majority parties, but also of those of the oppositions, on a subject so fundamental that it regards an important process of democratization of the representative function and that casts a dangerous shadow on the work carried out so far. It is quite clear that there is a clear desire to condition the trade union model by subjecting it to prior authorization, to the control of the administrations, to the transfer of union leaders, to the distortion of the 28 article of the 300 / 70 law and to a non-efficient representative system and functional. In light of this deleterious approach, the writers Unions military personnel, therefore, do not accept a regulatory framework that is lower than that of the state police, express their profound dissent and hope not to be forced to resort to street demonstrations to counter this retrospective and dangerous vision for the trade union freedom of military personnel.