The lawyers of Luca Palamara, the prosecutor under investigation for buying and selling sentences and information leakage, attack Repubblica through a note. "It hurts to note the persistent attack on the person of dr. Palamara by Repubblica for reasons whose purpose is difficult to understand”Reads the text. The ex-magistrate's lawyers contradict the newspaper on the rumors published in recent days, stating that "no emphasis was given to our request for rectification relating to the article of 6 July us entitled "Operation confusion". The maneuvers of the former prosecutor "and in particular of the circumstance that on 10 May 2019 the prosecutor of Perugia ordered a colonel from the GICO of the GDF to turn off the microphone where Dr. Palamara had met with parliamentarians in compliance with the provisions of Article 68 of the Constitution. This shutdown never took place. "
The reference is on an article that appeared entitled "My friend as a figurehead so I bought the beach for Palamara"In which, according to the lawyers, untrue news is reported, specifying that Palamara is not the owner of any beach in Sardinia or in other locations and as regards the further statement contained in the body of the article according to which the documents"there would be a series of messages certifying the active role of the magistrate in the management of the company”, That minimal investigation required of the journalist's activity would have avoided a sensational misunderstanding for the newspaper. In fact the message in which the dr. Palamara he claims "it is a discomfort ... a shameful beach"Refers not to the management of the kiosk but to the distinct and completely autonomous management of the beach to which Dr. Palamara corresponds to the subscription price for sunbeds and umbrellas through bank transfers. The complaints therefore concerned not the management of the kiosk but on the contrary the displeasure for the management of the beach and the sanitary conditions of the same, or simple complaints that every private citizen is in the right to formulate in case of disservice. "Finally, as regards the relationship with Mr. Aureli and the judicial affair that concerns his wife, it must be reiterated that there has been no interest, least of all with the PM, owner of the investigations, who independently determined himself for the indictment”Reads the note.