The China issue

(by Marco Zacchera) We must seriously deal with the problem of relations with China both as regards commercial and strategic aspects and to understand how Coronavirus was born and evolved. This is not only to outline any Chinese responsibilities, but above all for our future as it is yet another epidemic that "starts" from China, an evident sign that something is not working there.

I am not interested in spy stories but in facts, which is why the international community should start a serious investigation into what happened and the existing protocols to understand why they may not have been observed.

An investigation that are beginning to ask more and more insistently not only the USA but also India, Australia, France, Great Britain, Japan, Germany but NOT Italy which - especially since it commands the M5S - seems to feed an inexplicable psychological subjection in the against Beijing.

We cannot go on with silence: how is it that Wuhan has seen thousands of deaths and practically nobody has been registered in the other Chinese megacities, starting with the capital? The virus was already running since autumn as it seems and why, however, two months of silence, with crucial weeks lost to alert the world in an attempt to minimize if not to hide everything, even arresting the doctors who reported the epidemic?

If the genome of the virus had already been sequenced in China on 27 December, why then did Beijing subsequently provide false and misleading data, why was the alarm officially launched by Taiwan already in December ignored by WHO?

The reality is that no one knows what actually happened in China, how many were really dead and infected, our TV only shows images "granted", the correspondent Rai from Beijing, the ineffable Giovanna Botteri (the one all disheveled that seems not never change the usual black sweater for weeks) ranting about everything - including the controversy with Trump - but cannot (or does not want to) go out on the streets. Is this our freedom of information or are we subject to what Beijing wants to "pass"?

I do not believe in the hypothesis of the "wanted" virus and I do not know if its voluntary birth in the laboratory is credible, but I have personally seen the lousy hygiene conditions in the Chinese markets in a chilling and tolerated promiscuity.

That Beijing does not want inspections and controls is not good, it should be the WHO that demands them strongly, but here comes out the other aspect of the medal, that is the heavy infiltration of communist China into all international organizations. The West only now discovers (as I have examined in depth in my book THE INTEGRATION (IM) POSSIBLE? ”) That for years Beijing has been sowing, exploiting, convincing, buying offices and entire countries taking advantage of the tacit worldwide distraction.

Trump may be obnoxious to you and sometimes seem out of your mind, but he has understood that the general silence allows China to continue to expand without rules and without brakes in all fields - including environmental exploitation, coincidentally so forgotten by Greta's shift - and this thanks to complete internal control and the incredible combination of communism, statism and unrestrained free market capitalism.

For example it is absurd that Taiwan remains outside the WHO despite its advanced medical results and its importance: Not only the USA but now also Canada, Australia, Japan and many other states (obviously not Italy) are asking for their return ( it was part of it until 2016), but it is Beijing that obviously commands.

Instead of making fun of Trump let us ask ourselves why the US has kept silent for years - for example during the Obama presidencies - against China and we will see that, in the end, the great economic and financial business is centralized in a few hands, with solid roots in the US Democrats or those that are directly connected to the great financial powers that control the world, Soros and multinationals in the lead.

But let's go back to Italy: why this silence, why does Di Maio's little duck not want to understand the danger of the game? I begin to think that underneath there are very close economic interests between China, Casaleggio, M5S that make us more and more a Chinese diplomatic colony, a bridgehead of Beijing in Europe and this is not good, it is not logical, it is really dangerous .

Leaving the superficiality, the political debate should also focus on this strategic aspect with clear and agreed attitudes.

Of course, however, one should at least understand the risks of these policies: is Di Maio capable of this? Marcello Veneziani summarized well in recent days:

“In the global dome that holds media and techno-financial power, a priority prevails: to lift China from its faults on contagion and to focus on the collapse of Trump. It is a continuous message that takes pleasure in highlighting the difficulties of the USA and linking them to every Trump gaffe. Not only American hegemony avers against him, but the populist-sovereign model. It is thought that by bringing down him he widespread sovereignty.

But beyond Trump, the evaluations are divided: because one part would like to remain anchored to the liberal world of the West, to the politically correct US, to Obama, to understand us. While another part trusts in China or at least considers it useful for China's global power to balance that of the US and keep Putin's in check. Here, the Grillino party coincides with the Chinese party, from Di Maio to Di Battista, to Grillo; and a part of the left follows him, in hatred of Trump, for the sake of state capitalism, but also because he has been pro-Chinese since Prodi's time, then the gestures of Zingaretti & C, to open up to the Chinese despite the epidemic. In the background rises the temptation of a communism 2.0, a 5G communism, maocapitalist, technologically advanced, with capillary control and universal citizenship income for the serfs, indeed servants of global, understood as globalization. "The Italian model" heralded to tackle the virus is actually the Chinese model run in the Italian way. "

The China issue